This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: compatibility between gdb and stub

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
Cc: Romain Berrendonner <berrendo at ACT-Europe dot FR>,gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:19:24 -0500
Subject: Re: compatibility between gdb and stub
References: <20021118140945.GF1252@torino.act-europe.fr> <1021118225613.ZM5538@localhost.localdomain> <20021119092051.GD1217@torino.act-europe.fr> <1021120210450.ZM24337@localhost.localdomain>

As I understand it, if a stub replies with a short "g" packet, then
gdb will simply regard the missing registers as being unavailable.

Yes.

Andrew

References:
- compatibility between gdb and stub
  - From: Romain Berrendonner
- Re: compatibility between gdb and stub
  - From: Kevin Buettner
- Re: compatibility between gdb and stub
  - From: Romain Berrendonner
- Re: compatibility between gdb and stub
  - From: Kevin Buettner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]