This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -Wimplicit

From: Elias Athanasopoulos <eathan at otenet dot gr>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 20:31:47 +0200
Subject: Re: -Wimplicit
References: <20021104185751.B2076@neutrino.particles.org> <20021104154252.GB20768@nevyn.them.org>

Hi Daniel,

On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:42:52AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 06:57:51PM +0200, Elias Athanasopoulos wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Why gdb builts with -Wimplicit? With gcc from CVS I get:
> > 
> > cc1: warning: "-Wimplicit" is valid for C++ but not for C/ObjC
> 
> That's a bug in GCC then; it's a valid warning in C.

I agree. It seems that the bug introduced in this patch:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/msg00214.htmli

In the lines:

+  OPT("Wimplicit",           CL_CXX,   OPT_Wimplicit)                     \                      
+  OPT("Wimplicit-function-declaration",      CL_C, OPT_Wimplicit_function_decl)   \              
+  OPT("Wimplicit-int",               CL_C,     OPT_Wimplicit_int)                 \              
   
Elias

References:
- -Wimplicit
  - From: Elias Athanasopoulos
- Re: -Wimplicit
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]