This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''

From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:59:03 -0700
Subject: Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
References: <3D938E6F.6090809@redhat.com> <2427-Fri27Sep2002201112+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3D94A16E.6010409@redhat.com> <20020927182200.GA16046@nevyn.them.org> <15764.42249.38594.693286@localhost.redhat.com>

On Sep 27,  2:35pm, Elena Zannoni wrote:

>  > I think dummy-frame works well.
> 
> infcall.[ch] ? (which goes with infcmd.c)

I like this one.

I don't mind dummy-frame.[hc] either, but it's not 8.3 compliant.

Kevin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Elena Zannoni

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]