This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: xmmalloc?

From: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>, gdb <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 20 Sep 2002 16:48:17 -0700
Subject: Re: xmmalloc?
References: <ro14rcktgod.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU><20020920231602.GA4807@nevyn.them.org><1020920233340.ZM27766@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:33:41 -0700, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> said:
> On Sep 20,  7:16pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

>> Otherwise, should we just remove [xmmalloc] entirely?

> If no one makes a convincing case for it, I think it should be
> removed.

That's what I was hoping y'all would say!  I'd be happy to volunteer
to remove it if the consensus turns out to be that that would be a
good idea.  Not that I don't like adding new code to software, mind
you, but deleting code has its undeniable pleasures...

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu

References:
- xmmalloc?
  - From: David Carlton
- Re: xmmalloc?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: xmmalloc?
  - From: Kevin Buettner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]