This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [maint] sim and common

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <> writes:

  Andrew> I'm wondering if it would be helpful for sim specific
  Andrew> maintainers (at least for sim/common based sims) to have
  Andrew> implicit approval/write permission on the sim/common
  Andrew> directory.

Why do you feel it would be helpful?  I don't think there has been any
evidence that patch approvals for sim/common has been a bottleneck or
indeed even a problem for anyone to date.

  Andrew> Which reminds me, Stephane Carrez should really be listed as
  Andrew> the m68hc11 maintainer.  Unless, that is, GDB is going to
  Andrew> assume that a GDB target maintainer implicitly maintains the
  Andrew> corresponding SIM.

I'm happy enough with that idea, provided that there is a mechanism
for people to be listed explicitly as sim maintainers, overriding the
corresponding GDB maintainer for that port.  There are potential sim
maintainers who are capable of working on the sim but might not be
willing/able to work on GDB as well.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]