This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, rth at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:28:52 -0500
- Subject: Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]
- References: <200203280317.WAA05137@caip.rutgers.edu> <20020328034552.GB23767@codesourcery.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 05:19:04PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Or at least, that's the way it's *supposed* to be. :) Subversion is
> still a ways from a 1.0 release. But the developers are using it to
> manage its own source tree.
> Something to keep in mind in the future.
I think the expectation has always been to eventually replace CVS with
Subversion for the gcc repo (and presumably the src repo); it seems to
be a matter of "when" rather than "if" -- and "when" is "as soon as it's
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams