This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB 5.2 or GDB 5.1.1?

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com,Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:39:09 -0500
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2 or GDB 5.1.1?
References: <3C3CBCB8.90401@redhat.com> <3C43B0FF.9000506@cygnus.com> <3C473989.4090601@cygnus.com>

> For lack of opinion other than Daniel (thanks for the comments).  I'm going to:


Sorry.  An apology to Michael Chastain is in order.

Michael has gone through the 5.1 branch and confirmed it is far from 
regressing.  A 5.1.1 will definitly be more useable than 5.1.

http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2002-01-14/index.html

Andrew

References:
- GDB 5.2 or GDB 5.1.1?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: GDB 5.2 or GDB 5.1.1?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: GDB 5.2 or GDB 5.1.1?
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]