This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB C++ support
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, sassi at uni dot de
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:48:34 -0600
- Subject: Re: GDB C++ support
eli> You don't need to apologize about not having the information I asked
eli> for. But there's no need to be harsh, either.
Yeah, you're right, I got up grouchy this morning. I apologize for that.
Co-incidentally, I'm making test runs with stock 5.1 right now.
Here's an excerpt from gdb.log:
# gdb 5.1, gcc 3.0.2, -gdwarf-2, gdb.c++/method.exp
(gdb) break main^M
Breakpoint 1 at 0x8048549: file /berman/migchain/source/gdb-5.1/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/method.cc, line 66.^M
(gdb) run ^M
Starting program: /berman/migchain/build/native/gdb-5.1/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/method ^M
^M
Breakpoint 1, main () at /berman/migchain/source/gdb-5.1/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/method.cc:66^M
66 k = 10;^M
(gdb) break A::foo^M
Breakpoint 2 at 0x80484a6: file /berman/migchain/source/gdb-5.1/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/method.cc, line 38.^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.c++/method.exp: set breakpoint on A::foo
continue^M
Continuing.^M
^M
Breakpoint 2, A::foo(int) (this=0xbffff0e0, arg=13) at /berman/migchain/source/gdb-5.1/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/method.cc:38^M
38 x += arg;^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.c++/method.exp: continuing and breaking in A::foo
So you can see that 'break A::foo' works and gdb takes the breakpoint.
I don't know what that "FAIL" is about (that is a different issue).
Constructively,
Michael C