This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: auto-sync more files?
- To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: auto-sync more files?
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 03:18:33 -0500
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com,newlib at sources dot redhat dot com, cygwin at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <200111032102.fA3L25O07809@greed.delorie.com>
> The following directory and files are sorta common with the gcc
> repository (obviously, MAINTAINERS isn't the same file, but the name
> is). A few people have been asking for tighter syncing between these
> two repositories for the files that can be sync'd. I am willing to
> add these to the libiberty auto-sync script, but if I did it would
> mean that your projects would need to go through gcc-patches to get
> changes for these approved (like as already happens for libiberty).
>
> Comments?
Where GCC's repository is the master I think it makes sense.
Looking at the below, most are comming in from third party repositories.
I don't know that sucking in what ever GCC has is sensible unless
GCC's commit rules are closely aligned with src/s - for instance refuse
local changes until they have been approved in the local sources.
enjoy,
Andrew
>
> COPYING
> COPYING.LIB
> ChangeLog
> MAINTAINERS
> Makefile.in
> README
> config-ml.in
> config.guess
> config.if
> config.sub
> configure
> configure.in
> install-sh
> libtool.m4
> ltcf-c.sh
> ltcf-cxx.sh
> ltcf-gcj.sh
> ltconfig
> ltmain.sh
> missing
> mkdep
> mkinstalldirs
> move-if-change
> symlink-tree
> ylwrap
>
>