This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [1.3.3] breaks serial i/o?

To: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Subject: Re: [1.3.3] breaks serial i/o?
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 20:41:31 -0400
References: <20011018161003.A3059@saturn.billgatliff.com> <20011018222406.C11830@redhat.com> <20011019085618.A5013@saturn.billgatliff.com> <20011019114712.A23101@visi.com> <028e01c1594f$47cf7030$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>

I have a theory,

Dinosaurs are thin at one end, get fat in the middle, and er, sorry that 
is someone elses theory.

Lets try another theory:  GDB's corollary to Goodwin's Law.

``Every discussion about netiquette is reduced to quoting/referencing 
slabs of $GURU's latest manifest.''

As with Goodwin's law, at this point the thread is dead.  Oh, and as 
with Goodwin's law, the self referental nature of this corrolary means 
that invoking it is beyond debate ;-).

enjoy,
Andrew

References:
- [1.3.3] breaks serial i/o?
  - From: William A. Gatliff
- Re: [1.3.3] breaks serial i/o?
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: [1.3.3] breaks serial i/o?
  - From: William A. Gatliff
- Re: [1.3.3] breaks serial i/o?
  - From: Grant Edwards
- Re: [1.3.3] breaks serial i/o?
  - From: Robert Collins

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]