This is the mail archive of the gdb-testers@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[binutils-gdb] Fix leak in splay-tree


*** TEST RESULTS FOR COMMIT d7167c671da0323daf31a8e07945c57c25f858d2 ***

Author: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Branch: master
Commit: d7167c671da0323daf31a8e07945c57c25f858d2

Fix leak in splay-tree

Philippe Waroquiers noticed a memory leak in gdb, which he tracked
down to a bug in splay-tree.  splay_tree_remove does not call the
`delete_key' function when it removes the old node; but it should.

I looked at every splay tree in GCC and there is only one that passes
a non-NULL delete function -- the one in lto.c.  That file does not
call splay_tree_remove.  So, I think this is safe to check in.

I re-ran the LTO tests to double check.

libiberty/
	* splay-tree.c (splay_tree_remove): Delete the key if necessary.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]