This is the mail archive of the gdb-testers@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[binutils-gdb] x86: drop CpuRegMMX, CpuReg[XYZ]MM, and CpuRegMask


*** TEST RESULTS FOR COMMIT 6e041cf4b0b00e85bee85bee98c411f16bd15747 ***

Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Branch: master
Commit: 6e041cf4b0b00e85bee85bee98c411f16bd15747

x86: drop CpuRegMMX, CpuReg[XYZ]MM, and CpuRegMask

It's not clear to me why they had been introduced - the respective
comments in opcodes/i386-gen.c are certainly wrong: ymm<N> registers
are very well supported (and necessary) with just AVX512F.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]