[binutils-gdb] x86: derive DispN from BaseIndex

[sergiodj+buildbot at sergiodj dot net]

*** TEST RESULTS FOR COMMIT 7ac20022477c163983de77e5b16c016d518ca7bc ***

Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Branch: master
Commit: 7ac20022477c163983de77e5b16c016d518ca7bc

x86: derive DispN from BaseIndex

BaseIndex implies - with the exception of string instructions the
optional presence of a displacement. This is almost completely uniform
for all instructions (the sole exception being MPX ones, which don't
allow 16-bit addressing and hence Disp16), so there's no point in
explicitly stating this in the main opcode table. Drop those explict
specifications in favor of adding logic to i386-gen, shrinking the
table size quite a bit and hence making it more readable.

The opcodes/i386-tbl.h changes are due to a few cases where pointless
Disp* still hadn't been removed from their insns.