[binutils-gdb] Handle DW_OP_form_tls_address

[sergiodj+buildbot at sergiodj dot net]

*** TEST RESULTS FOR COMMIT 4aa4e28bdcf5f0d733def62b542fea11d5f219d5 ***

Author: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Branch: master
Commit: 4aa4e28bdcf5f0d733def62b542fea11d5f219d5

Handle DW_OP_form_tls_address

Currently gdb supports DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address, but not
DW_OP_form_tls_address.  I think it would be better if the toolchain
as a whole moved to using the standard opcode, and the prerequisite to
this is getting gdb to recognize it.

GCC can sometimes emit DW_OP_form_tls_address for emultls targets.  As
far as I know, nobody has ever tried this with gdb (since it wouldn't
work at all).

I don't think there's a major drawback to using a single opcode for
all targets, because computing the location of a thread-local is
already target specific.

This is PR gdb/11616.

I don't know how to write a test case for this; though it's worth
noting that there aren't explicit tests for DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address
either -- and if I change GCC, these paths will be tested to the same
extent they are now.

2016-09-02  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>

	PR gdb/11616:
	* dwarf2read.c (decode_locdesc): Handle DW_OP_form_tls_address.
	* dwarf2loc.c (dwarf2_compile_expr_to_ax): Handle
	DW_OP_form_tls_address.
	(locexpr_describe_location_piece): Likewise.
	* dwarf2expr.h (struct dwarf_expr_context_funcs): Update comment.
	* dwarf2expr.c (execute_stack_op): Handle DW_OP_form_tls_address.
	(ctx_no_get_tls_address): Mention DW_OP_form_tls_address.
	* compile/compile-loc2c.c (struct insn_info): Update comment.
	(compute_stack_depth_worker): Handle DW_OP_form_tls_address.