This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug remote/23801] remote target code slowed by unnecessary remote_check_symbols() calls


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23801

Simon Marchi <simon.marchi at ericsson dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |simon.marchi at ericsson dot com

--- Comment #1 from Simon Marchi <simon.marchi at ericsson dot com> ---
That would make sense, I believe.

It would be good to give it a test run to make sure this introduces no
regression, with

make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-gdbserver"

and 

make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-extended-gdbserver"

It is expected (but not desired) that there are many failures when running the
testsuite, so we usually run the tests without and with the patch, and then
compare the two resulting testsuite/gdb.sum files.  More details here:

https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/TestingGDB

If this works well, here are the instructions for submitting a patch:

https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ContributionChecklist

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]