This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug gdb/22943] [aarch64] Failures in gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22943

Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |brobecker at gnat dot com

--- Comment #7 from Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com> ---
I am really torn; although the code is as you say based on GCC code, so it
helps convincing ourselves that at least the intent should be correct, it is
still possible that it caused some regressions. Given that this is not a
regression, and given the fact that this touches inferior function call in
general and no one reported it before the test appeared, I would tend to be on
the conservative side, and leave this out of 8.2.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]