This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug gdb/22670] regressions in Ada caused by introduction of wild matching in C++ patch series
- From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 08:32:20 +0000
- Subject: [Bug gdb/22670] regressions in Ada caused by introduction of wild matching in C++ patch series
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-22670-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22670
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Joel Brobecker <brobecke@sourceware.org>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=344420da6beac1e0b2f7964e7101f8dcdb509b0d
commit 344420da6beac1e0b2f7964e7101f8dcdb509b0d
Author: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Date: Thu Jan 4 02:39:58 2018 -0500
Add "complete break ada" test to gdb.ada/complete.exp
This patch adds a new test to demonstrate a regression introduced by:
commit b5ec771e60c1a0863e51eb491c85c674097e9e13
Date: Wed Nov 8 14:22:32 2017 +0000
Subject: Introduce lookup_name_info and generalize Ada's FULL/WILD name
matching
The original purpose of the new test is to exercise the "complete"
command with an expression for which a large number of matches are
returned and to verify that each match returned is a plausible match.
In this particular case, the commit above causes GDB to generate
additional matches which should in fact not appear in the list
(internally generated symbols, or symbols that should be enclosed
between "<...>"). These extraneous entries are easy to spot, because
they have uppercase characters, such as:
break ada__stringsS
break ada__strings__R11s
[etc]
For now, the new test is KFAIL'ed, to avoid generating a new FAIL
while we work on fixing that regression.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR gdb/22670
* gdb.ada/complete.exp: Add "complete break ada" test.
Tested on x86_64-linux with GDB built before and after the patch
that caused the regression (b5ec771e60c1a0863e51eb491c85c674097e9e13).
The test passes before the regression, and generates a KFAIL after.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.