This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug c++/16874] Setting a breakpoint on function in anonymous namespace is unnecessarily awkward
- From: "palves at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:29:44 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/16874] Setting a breakpoint on function in anonymous namespace is unnecessarily awkward
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-16874-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16874
--- Comment #17 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Dave Malcolm from comment #16)
> (In reply to Pedro Alves from comment #15)
> > The series above is finally all merged to master. These are the related
> > improvements that you'll find there:
>
> [...]
>
> Thanks for the improvements!
My pleasure! Making things better for GCC folks was one of my
sekrit driving forces. :-)
> To clarify, if there is a symbol:
>
> (anonymous namespace)::func()
>
> will "break func" set a breakpoint on it? (without me having to type or
> tab-complete the "(anonymous namespace)" part?)
>
> [...]
Yes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.