This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug gdb/20977] GDB exception handling is broken on i686-w64-mingw32
- From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:31:16 +0000
- Subject: [Bug gdb/20977] GDB exception handling is broken on i686-w64-mingw32
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-20977-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20977
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gdb-7.12-branch branch has been updated by Pedro Alves
<palves@sourceware.org>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ada8ff522ce970e11dae4a3463c899b64e6f5006
commit ada8ff522ce970e11dae4a3463c899b64e6f5006
Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Dec 20 16:25:54 2016 +0000
Fix longjmp across readline w/ --enable-sjlj-exceptions toolchains
Nowadays, GDB propagates C++ exceptions across readline using
setjmp/longjmp 89525768cd08 ("Propagate GDB/C++ exceptions across
readline using sj/lj-based TRY/CATCH") because DWARF-based unwinding
can't cross C functions compiled without -fexceptions (see details
from the commit above).
Unfortunately, toolchains that use SjLj-based C++ exceptions got
broken with that fix, because _Unwind_SjLj_Unregister, which is put at
the exit of a function, is not executed due to the longjmp added by
that commit.
(gdb) [New Thread 2936.0xb80]
kill
Thread 1 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x03ff662b in ?? ()
top?bt 15
#0 0x03ff662b in ?? ()
#1 0x00526b92 in stdin_event_handler (error=0, client_data=0x172ed8)
at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/event-top.c:555
#2 0x00525a94 in handle_file_event (ready_mask=<optimized out>,
file_ptr=0x3ff5cb8) at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/event-loop.c:733
#3 gdb_wait_for_event (block=block@entry=1)
at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/event-loop.c:884
#4 0x00525bfb in gdb_do_one_event ()
at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/event-loop.c:347
#5 0x00525ce5 in start_event_loop ()
at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/event-loop.c:371
#6 0x0051fada in captured_command_loop (data=0x0)
at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:324
#7 0x0051cf5d in catch_errors (
func=func@entry=0x51fab0 <captured_command_loop(void*)>,
func_args=func_args@entry=0x0,
errstring=errstring@entry=0x7922bf
<VEC_interp_factory_p_quick_push(VEC_inte rp_factory_p*, interp_factory*, char
const*, unsigned int)::__PRETTY_FUNCTION__+351> "",
mask=mask@entry=RETURN_MASK_ALL)
at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/exceptions.c:236
#8 0x00520f0c in captured_main (data=0x328feb4)
at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:1149
#9 gdb_main (args=args@entry=0x328feb4) at
../../binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:1159
#10 0x0071e400 in main (argc=1, argv=0x171220)
at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/gdb.c:32
Fix this by making the functions involved in setjmp/longjmp as
noexcept, so that the compiler knows it doesn't need to emit the
_Unwind_SjLj_Register / _Unwind_SjLj_Unregister calls for C++
exceptions.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 23 with:
- GCC 5.3.1 w/ DWARF-based exceptions.
- GCC 7 built with --enable-sjlj-exceptions.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2016-12-20 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
PR gdb/20977
* event-top.c (gdb_rl_callback_read_char_wrapper_noexcept): New
noexcept function, factored out from ...
(gdb_rl_callback_read_char_wrapper): ... this.
(gdb_rl_callback_handler): Mark noexcept.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.