This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug threads/19426] in non-stop mode, gdb should sometimes select the stopping thread


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19426

--- Comment #5 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to Pedro Alves from comment #3)

> and in all-stop, I get:
> 
>   "resume all threads" + "wait for any thread stop".
> 
> So basically the resumption command sets the interpreter to wait for any of
> the threads resumed by the last synchronous command (and perhaps their
> children).

I think that probably what I am really looking for is a way to have
multi-inferior and all-stop; or maybe multi-inferior and "all-stop on
a per-process basis".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]