This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug tdep/7627] Is gdbarch_bits_big_endian needed?
- From: "tromey at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: 3 Jun 2010 17:12:30 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tdep/7627] Is gdbarch_bits_big_endian needed?
- References: <20020503093800.7627.ac131313@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat dot com 2010-06-03 17:12 -------
BTW, I asked on #gcc and Ian said:
<iant> On ARM bits are always little-endian, but bytes are configurable
<iant> on MIPS bits are always little-endian but bytes are usually big-endian
(though again configurable)
It is a little surprising to me that none of these cases have ever
been reported as gdb bugs.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7627
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.