This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb/1349: Update src/expect to 5.39
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 21 Aug 2003 22:28:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: gdb/1349: Update src/expect to 5.39
- Reply-to: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
The following reply was made to PR build/1349; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: gdb/1349: Update src/expect to 5.39
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:27:35 -0400
Here's what I've got in my test bed.
First my test bed is native i686-pc-linux-gnu, so it's limited.
I test with the official release versions:
tcl 8.4.3
expect 5.38
dejagnu 1.4.3
In January 2003, I compared this T+E+D stack with the T+E+D stack
from sourceware cvs. They compared fine, no significant differences.
I am upgrading to expect 5.39 soon. When I do the upgrade I will
also compare against sourceware T+E+D again and report back.
I would rather do this in the winter, when I have to pay for heat
anyways, but what the heck. :)
I diff'ed expect 5.38 versus expect 5.39. There are some innocuous
bug fixes, including a 64-bit bug fix. So at least one person is
using expect on at least one 64-bit system (PA-RISC 2.0 with
--enable-64bit). There is nothing that says "haha, we are going
to break a bunch of syntax and screw dejagnu users".
So I'm feeling pretty good about upgrading my test bed, and I think
it will be okay to upgrade sourceware as well.
BTW the vintages on everything in sourceware are:
tcl 8.4.1 # current is 8.4.3
expect 1998-06-15 # damn!
dejagnu 1.4.3 # current is 1.4.3