This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: c++/1069: Issues printing derived objects with gdb
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 3 Mar 2003 19:58:00 -0000
- Subject: RE: c++/1069: Issues printing derived objects with gdb
- Reply-to: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
The following reply was made to PR c++/1069; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: gdb-gnats at sources dot redhat dot com
Cc:
Subject: RE: c++/1069: Issues printing derived objects with gdb
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:55:12 -0500
Forwarding with permission. The two attachments are attached to the
PR.
----- Forwarded message from Monte Becker <monte at juniper dot net> -----
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:30:34 -0500
From: "Monte Becker" <monte at juniper dot net>
Subject: RE: c++/1069: Issues printing derived objects with gdb
To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow at mvista dot com>
Daniel,
The only interesting IP comes from somewhere else anyways, so
here it is unchanged.
Compile command is in main.C. GDB output in in "foo.gdbOutput".
It looks like I used this form
p b.gen()
rather then
p b->gen()
that caused the core dump.
Monte
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz [mailto:drow at mvista dot com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:18 PM
> To: Monte Becker
> Subject: Re: c++/1069: Issues printing derived objects with gdb
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 12:09:56PM -0500, Monte Becker wrote:
> >
> > Daniel,
> >
> > I deleted all break points, and then tried again. I think I
> > described the problem incorrectly. It appears that
> >
> > 1) The print is ignored (no output)
> > 2) Program execution resumes (as if cont command used)
> >
> > Before, I had a break point at a spot that was called
> frequently.
> > I believe that before I deleted the break points, 1) and 2)
> occurred,
> > but then the program stopped at the same break point.
> (Does that make
> > since? I can try to be more clear if needed.)
>
> So you call a function, and never get a prompt back - te program
> resumes? I'd love to see a testcase for this.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer