This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: build/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: kettenis at gnu dot org
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 3 Feb 2003 01:58:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: build/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
- Reply-to: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
The following reply was made to PR build/979; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: kettenis@gnu.org, gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: build/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 20:50:13 -0500
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 11:05:36AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > I think that is a different problem - the dgux was folded into i386v4 so
> >> really doesn't exist.
> >
> >
> >I disagree; we still support the host. Obsoleting it isn't a matter of
> >deleting the code, it's more a matter of undocumenting the support. I
> >don't think this PR is fixed.
>
> GDB supports SVR4 native systems. DGUX is an SVR4 native system.
> Obsoleting SVR4 native is a new task.
But we don't care about obsoleting SVR4 native. The point of
MichaelC's proposal was that DG/UX (just DG/UX) was one of the last
systems using DWARF-1. If we want to lose the DWARF-1 reader, it's
DG/UX that has to go, not SVR4 native.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer