This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: build/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: kettenis at gnu dot org
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 2 Feb 2003 05:38:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: build/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
- Reply-to: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
The following reply was made to PR build/979; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: kettenis@gnu.org, gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: build/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 00:31:34 -0500
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 08:08:00PM -0000, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR build/979; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
> Cc: cagney@redhat.com, gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: build/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 14:29:24 -0500
>
> > Andrew, I'm a little confused that you closed this. Mark K just changed
> > config.host so that i[3456]86-dg-dgux is a generic i386v4. I'm looking
> > to actually obsolete it so that we don't support it any more and can
> > move closer to DWARF-1 obsolescence.
>
> I think that is a different problem - the dgux was folded into i386v4 so
> really doesn't exist.
I disagree; we still support the host. Obsoleting it isn't a matter of
deleting the code, it's more a matter of undocumenting the support. I
don't think this PR is fixed.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer