This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gdb/338: gcore.exp started failing


The following reply was made to PR gdb/338; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: gdb/338: gcore.exp started failing
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:12:42 -0500

 On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 09:18:00PM -0000, kettenis@chello.nl wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR gdb/338; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: kettenis@chello.nl
 > To: geoffk@redhat.com
 > Cc: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
 > Subject: Re: gdb/338: gcore.exp started failing
 > Date: 4 Feb 2002 21:09:41 -0000
 > 
 >     Date: 4 Feb 2002 17:26:21 -0000
 >     From: geoffk@redhat.com
 >  
 >     I suspect this change:
 >  
 >     2002-01-19  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>
 >  
 >  	   * i386gnu-nat.c: Include "i386-tdep.h".
 >  	   (fetch_fpregs): Simplify code dealing with uninitialized floating
 >  	   point states such that it doesn't require FP7_REGNUM.
 >  
 >     but have not tried backing it out to see if the problem goes away.
 >  
 >  That's not very likely :-) since i386gnu-nat.c isn't used on Linux.
 >  It's more likely that the following change is the culprit:
 >  
 >  2002-01-14  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@redhat.com>
 >  
 >  	* linux-proc.c (linux_do_thread_registers): Ignore fpxregs
 >  	until we can resolve portability issues.
 >  	* gregset.h: Remove references to fpxregs.
 >  	* gcore.c (gcore_command): Initialize note_sec to NULL.
 >  
 >  The SSE registers are no longer saved in the generated core, and upon
 >  loading that core GDB fills them with the dummy values you're seeing.
 >  We should probably XFAIL that test for i?86-*-linux-gnu*.  Or we
 >  should correctly implement generic handling of extended registers sets
 >  in GDB.
 
 Yes, that's the change that caused the problem.  Before it was reverted
 there were another set of problems on MIPS.  You got the solution
 perfectly right, too :)
 
 -- 
 Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
 MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]