This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
gdb/123: Check that GDB can handle all BFD architectures
- To: gdb-gnats at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: gdb/123: Check that GDB can handle all BFD architectures
- From: ac131313 at cygnus dot com
- Date: 7 Jul 2001 02:51:26 -0000
- Reply-To: ac131313 at cygnus dot com
>Number: 123
>Category: gdb
>Synopsis: Check that GDB can handle all BFD architectures
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Fri Jul 06 19:58:02 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: ac131313@cygnus.com
>Release: unknown-1.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
Check that GDB can handle all BFD architectures (Andrew Cagney)
There should be a test that checks that BFD/GDB are in sync with
regard to architecture changes. Something like a test that first
queries GDB for all supported architectures and then feeds each back
to GDB.. Anyone interested in learning how to write tests? :-)
Even more silly is ``set architecture <tab>'' where
half the architectures are not supported.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: