This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix amd64->i386 linux syscall restart problem
- From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
- To: Tom de Vries <tdevries at suse dot de>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:00:01 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix amd64->i386 linux syscall restart problem
- References: <20190316221341.021f7c62@f29-4.lan> <975e7120-1b61-2807-5aab-b961e07a80d0@redhat.com> <20190409192916.79fcb539@f29-4.lan> <bc353e59-f640-2d09-8a71-984f0102733e@redhat.com> <20190410171606.0e736077@f29-4.lan> <40eb20c2-f6d0-eb16-d6fe-c717138b6559@suse.de> <c8913564-b950-6091-0d17-04938953367a@suse.de>
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:34:46 +0200
Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> wrote:
> On 21-05-19 14:59, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 11-04-19 02:16, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> >> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:42:30 +0100
> >> Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Below is a diff showing the new comments. It also includes the
> >>>> changes which wrap the multi-line expressions in parens.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, that new version of the comment looks great.
> >>
> >> It's in now. Thanks for the review.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the tests fixed by this commit fail on the 8.3 branch (filed as PR24592).
> >
> > The commit applies cleanly on the 8.3 branch, and make the tests pass.
> >
> > OK to backport?
>
> Hi,
>
> [ Ping. ]
>
> I'm probably missing some context here. It seems sofar there are no
> commits to the 8.3 branch. AFAIU, a respin release 8.3.1 is targeted for
> 3 months after 8.3, so around 11th of August.
>
> What kind of fixes are acceptable for the respin? Do they have to be
> regression fixes? Or are functionality fixes like this one also allowed?
> Who's responsibility is it to backport fixes?
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
I'm okay with it going into the next point release for 8.3.
Kevin