This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 5/9] Add a helper function to resolve TLS variable addresses for FreeBSD.


On 2/6/19 9:04 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2019-01-24 12:08, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On 1/22/19 10:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> The fbsd_get_thread_local_address function accepts the base address of
>>> a thread's DTV array and the base address of an object file's link map
>>> and uses this to compute a TLS variable's address.  FreeBSD
>>> architectures use an architecture-specific method to determine the
>>> address of the DTV array pointer and call this helper function to
>>> perform the rest of the address calculation.
>>>
>>> 	* fbsd-tdep.c (fbsd_pspace_data_handle): New variable.
>>> 	(struct fbsd_pspace_data): New type.
>>> 	(get_fbsd_pspace_data, fbsd_pspace_data_cleanup)
>>> 	(fbsd_read_integer_by_name, fbsd_fetch_rtld_offsets)
>>> 	(fbsd_get_tls_index, fbsd_get_thread_local_address): New function.
>>> 	(_initialize_fbsd_tdep): Initialize 'fbsd_pspace_data_handle'.
>>> 	* fbsd-tdep.c (fbsd_get_thread_local_address): New prototype.
>>> ---
>>>  gdb/ChangeLog   |  10 ++++
>>>  gdb/fbsd-tdep.c | 146 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  gdb/fbsd-tdep.h |  10 ++++
>>>  3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gdb/fbsd-tdep.c b/gdb/fbsd-tdep.c
>>> index d971d3a653..2e0f72d17b 100644
>>> --- a/gdb/fbsd-tdep.c
>>> +++ b/gdb/fbsd-tdep.c
>>> +
>>> +/* Lookup offsets of fields in the runtime linker's 'Obj_Entry'
>>> +   structure needed to determine the TLS index of an object file.  */
>>> +
>>> +static void
>>> +fbsd_fetch_rtld_offsets (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct 
>>> fbsd_pspace_data *data)
>>> +{
>>> +  TRY
>>> +    {
>>> +      /* Fetch offsets from debug symbols in rtld.  */
>>> +      data->off_linkmap = parse_and_eval_long ("&((Obj_Entry 
>>> *)0)->linkmap");
>>> +      data->off_tlsindex = parse_and_eval_long ("&((Obj_Entry 
>>> *)0)->tlsindex");
>>> +      data->rtld_offsets_valid = true;
>>> +      return;
>>
>> I'm not really happy about using parse_and_eval_long with an open-coded
>> equivalent of offsetof() here.  It seems we don't already have existing
>> functionality for this though?  I think I could use 'lookup_struct' to 
>> find
>> the 'struct type *' for 'Obj_Entry', but if I used 
>> 'lookup_struct_elt_type'
>> to get the type of an element that doesn't give me anything that has 
>> the
>> offset.  We could perhaps instead add a new function 
>> 'lookup_struct_elt_offset'
>> that took the element name as a string and figured out the offset.  We 
>> could
>> then use this to provide an 'offsetof' builtin for the C language 
>> perhaps.
>> However, I suspect that lookup_struct_elt_offset would have to invoke a
>> language-specific function to do the actual computation (just as ptype 
>> /o
>> handling is language-specific).
> 
> Doesn't parse_and_eval_long also call in language-specific things?  The 
> expression is parsed according to whatever is the current language, I 
> suppose.  If needed, I guess we could change temporarily the current 
> language to C, which is the language the dynamic linker is written in 
> (until proven otherwise).

Mmm, that's true.

> The offset of fields within structures is available (see macro 
> FIELD_BITPOS).  I haven't looked too deep into it, but it sounds like it 
> should be possible to implement what you need with that.

Hmm.  When I looked at the code for ptype /o it seemed to keep a running
tally for the byte offset.  It wasn't clear to me if perhaps FIELD_BITPOS
was for bitfields and the bit offset within a byte/word.  However, the
Linux kernel patch series does have some code to do this.  I could perhaps
steal from that to implement lookup_struct_elt_offset.  I would probably
make it support nested fields as well (I think the Linux kernel patches are
using it for some nested fields).

> One question: does this work only when you have debug info for the 
> dynamic linker data structures?  Will debug info always be available?  
> On some Linux distributions, for example, I think it's rather common to 
> not have the debug info for the system libraries (libc, libpthread) by 
> default.

Yes, this requires debug symbols.  Recent releases of FreeBSD do include an
option to install them by default, but they are not always present.  I will
probably add global variables in rtld itself similar to the ones inside of
the thread library and then update GDB to fetch those instead once I've done
that.  I just haven't patched the runtime linker yet for that.

-- 
John Baldwin

                                                                            


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]