This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/3] include/dis-asm.h: Fix warning: Include "string.h" for strchr


On 2018-12-02 8:05 a.m., Stafford Horne wrote:
> I got this warning when building the OpenRISC sim target.
> 
> Warning:
> 
> In file included from ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/or1k/../common/cgen-trace.c:26:
> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/or1k/../../include/dis-asm.h: In function ‘next_disassembler_option’:
> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/or1k/../../include/dis-asm.h:343:21: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘strchr’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>    const char *opt = strchr (options, ',');
>                      ^~~~~~
> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/or1k/../../include/dis-asm.h:343:21: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘strchr’
> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/or1k/../../include/dis-asm.h:343:21: note: include ‘<string.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘strchr’
> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/or1k/../../include/dis-asm.h:40:1:
> +#include <string.h>
> 
> ../../../binutils-gdb/sim/or1k/../../include/dis-asm.h:343:21:
>    const char *opt = strchr (options, ',');
>                      ^~~~~~
> 
> include/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	dis-asm.h: Include "string.h"
> ---
>  include/dis-asm.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dis-asm.h b/include/dis-asm.h
> index 84627950c0..823bba5b45 100644
> --- a/include/dis-asm.h
> +++ b/include/dis-asm.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ extern "C" {
>  #endif
>  
>  #include <stdio.h>
> +/* For strchr.  */
> +#ifdef HAVE_STRING_H
> +#include <string.h>
> +#endif
>  #include "bfd.h"
>  
>    typedef int (*fprintf_ftype) (void *, const char*, ...) ATTRIBUTE_FPTR_PRINTF_2;
> 

Hi Stafford,

It looks like this patchset fell through the cracks (I found it while searching for
something else).  A version of this patch went in, witout the HAVE_STRING_H ifdef.
Do you think the ifdef is necessary in practice?

Simon

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]