This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] sim/opcodes: Allow use of out of tree cgen source directory


On 2018-11-06 12:35, Andrew Burgess wrote:
diff --git a/opcodes/configure.ac b/opcodes/configure.ac
index 4c3698356b..9e48fedf9a 100644
--- a/opcodes/configure.ac
+++ b/opcodes/configure.ac
@@ -109,11 +109,21 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE(cgen-maint,
   yes)	cgen_maint=yes ;;
   no)	cgen_maint=no ;;
   *)
-	# argument is cgen install directory (not implemented yet).
-	# Having a `share' directory might be more appropriate for the .scm,
-	# .cpu, etc. files.
+	# Argument is a directory where cgen can be found.  In some
+	# future world cgen could be installable, but right now this
+	# is not the case.  Instead we assume the directory is a path
+	# to the cgen source tree.
 	cgen_maint=yes
-	cgendir=${cgen_maint}/lib/cgen
+        if test -r ${enableval}/iformat.scm; then
+          # This looks like a cgen source tree.
+	  cgendir=${enableval}
+        else
+          # This code would handle a cgen install.  For now we assume
+          # 'lib', but this is really just a place holder.  Maybe
+          # having a `share' directory might be more appropriate for
+          # the .scm, .cpu, etc. files.
+	  cgendir=${enableval}/lib/cgen
+        fi
 	;;
 esac])dnl
 AM_CONDITIONAL(CGEN_MAINT, test x${cgen_maint} = xyes)

Just wondering, does the "else" part have any real-world use? Before today, was there any reason to pass a path to --enable-cgen-maint ?

Simon


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]