This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix gdb.arch/amd64-invalid-stack-*.exp failures
On Mon, 2018-08-27 at 11:26 -0400, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2018-08-27 09:38 AM, Jan Vrany wrote:
> > Commit 6d52907e226a (MI: Print frame architecture when printing frames
> > on an MI channel) broke amd64-invalid-stack-middle.exp and
> > amd64-invalid-stack-middle.exp because regexps were not updated.
> >
> > Fix it by updating regexps to accommodate new "arch" field.
>
> In the other thread, you mentioned not being able to run the -middle.exp test
> because of:
>
> gdb compile failed, /usr/bin/ld: /home/jv/Projects/gdb/users_jv_patches/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.arch/amd64-invalid-stack-middle/amd64-invalid-stack-middle0.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against
> `.rodata' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIC
>
> That's probably because you have a "recent" toolchain that tries to build PIE executables
> by default. However, the assembly file has been generated without the position-independent
> code switch (-fPIC), so it includes code that can't end up in a position-independent
> executable.
>
> I see 3 solutions:
>
> 1. Re-generate the file using the command in amd64-invalid-stack-middle.S, but with
> -fPIC. That's a bit risky, because we need to make sure the new compiler emits
> code that would trigger the same bug the test has been written for.
> 2. Manually change amd64-invalid-stack-middle.S to remove things relying on .rodata.
> That may be a bit tedious and risky too.
> 3. Add the -no-pie linker switch to force generating position-dependent executables.
>
> Solution #3 is easy and safe, so I would lean towards that, it's a one-liner:
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-invalid-stack-middle.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-invalid-stack-middle.exp
> index c00bfa10bd1b..b17eea59edc2 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-invalid-stack-middle.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-invalid-stack-middle.exp
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> # run twice, and we restart gdb before testing each different command to
> # ensure that nothing is being cached.
>
> -set opts {}
> +set opts {ldflags=-no-pie}
> standard_testfile .S
>
> if { ![istarget x86_64-*-* ] || ![is_lp64_target] } {
>
>
> ---
>
> With that, you should be able to run the test and confirm your patch works.
Yes, with you patch amd64-invalid-stack-middle.exp passes here. Thanks!
> It does fix the failures when I run it locally, and the patch LGTM.
>
> If you want to make a proper patch to add the -no-pie flag, you are welcome
> to.
I'll do tomorrow.
Thanks, Jan
>
> Thanks,
>
> Simon