This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] icc: allow code path for newer versions of icc.


On 09/20/2017 03:17 PM, Tedeschi, Walfred wrote:

> Hello Simon and Pedro,
> 
> I have prepared a cleaning patch first and another one with the icc
> version check.
> 
> The changes are in:
> users/wtedesch/icc_version
> 
> Comments are welcome!

Thanks!

Speaking for myself, while a git branch is handy for trying
locally (and I tend to push changes to branches too to help
others for larger series, in addition to posting on the list),
I still find it easier to reply/review to patches sent via email,
because that allows conveniently quoting patches.

But I went ahead and took a quick look.  I have to say that
don't care for the "dwarf2utils" name much BTW.  My issue with
"utils.h|c" is that "utils" is a kitchen sync name; almost anything
can be called an "utility".  And "dwarf2utils" has almost the same
issue, in my view.  Note that I had suggested producers.h/c without
a "dwarf" qualification because the producers string is exposed
in generic code, through symtab.h:compunit_symtab etc.
(even though the producers info is currently only sourced
from DWARF info).

As for the the rest, it seems like several previous comments
haven't been addressed yet, so I'll wait for a repost.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]