This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [doc] NEWS: QCatchSyscalls: simplify


> Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 19:50:32 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be,
>         sergiodj@redhat.com, palves@redhat.com, xdje42@gmail.com,
>         scox@redhat.com, jistone@redhat.com
> 
> On Sun, 29 May 2016 19:29:19 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Is it really that bad?  I generally tend to let people say things in
> > their own words, as long as it's readable.  But if you insist...
> 
> That :1 and :0 was confusing to me as it is very different from all the other
> remote packets announced in the NEWS file, therefore I was looking at the
> protocol how is this packet special.  How can be ':' a part of the packet name
> when ':' is a parameter delimiter?  And I haven't found anything special on
> this packet.
> 
> Similarly the qSupported looked special to me and again it does not seem to be
> anyhow special.  Even "N stop reply" announced right above uses the standard
> template.
> 
> Besides that all IMO one of the purposes of the NEWS file is to be brief.
> 
> Sure I do not mind but I was reviewing a derived downstream documentation and
> I just found it.

If you feel strongly about this, please go ahead and commit.

Thanks.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]