This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB 7.10 release 2015-07-17 status update?
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org>
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, Luis Machado <lgustavo at codesourcery dot com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, keiths at redhat dot com, Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, Yunlian Jiang <yunlian at google dot com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:37:49 +0100
- Subject: Re: GDB 7.10 release 2015-07-17 status update?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150717175328 dot GA15874 at adacore dot com> <55A94617 dot 1040701 at codesourcery dot com> <83r3o661z4 dot fsf at gnu dot org> <55B204B8 dot 9030101 at redhat dot com> <CABOHX+fN=PHd4AiY8MmP0jAoENyOw8_LU388hfiPdWEP4O9C4Q at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 07/24/2015 03:30 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 24 July 2015 at 11:26, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/17/2015 08:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:14:47 -0300
>>>> From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
>>>> CC: <keiths@redhat.com>, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, <yunlian@google.com>
>>>>
>>>> Do we consider the fact that mingw32 (and maybe other non-GNU) builds
>>>> have been broken since this libiberty sync a blocker/critical issue?
>>>
>>> It's not broken: I've built the pretest with that problem in it, and
>>> it does build, albeit with a (harmless) warning.
>>>
>>>> Last we heard of it was here...
>>>>
>>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-06/msg00654.html
>>>
>>> The release tarball builds without -Werror, so this warning is just a
>>> warning, since asprintf does return an int.
>>
>> It's also a varargs function though; varargs functions
>> must have a visible prototype. I wouldn't be surprised if this
>> resulted in a crash/corruption on some targets/abis.
>>
>> ISTR seeing a patch for this, but I can't find it now.
>>
>> Did I just imagine it?
>>
>
> Do you mean: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-07/msg00570.html
>
Ah, yes. Looks good to me, though bfd is owned by binutils; the
patch needs to be sent to the binutils@ list.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves