This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [doc patch] compile: missing bits [Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] compile: New 'compile print']
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Paul_Koning at dell dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, pmuldoon at redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:31:02 +0300
- Subject: Re: [doc patch] compile: missing bits [Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] compile: New 'compile print']
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150406172623 dot 31404 dot 58833 dot stgit at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <20150406172716 dot 31404 dot 8551 dot stgit at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <83bnj1jgsw dot fsf at gnu dot org> <021F612D-0E51-44ED-BA7F-894A8B51F5BF at dell dot com> <20150406175250 dot GA314 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <0484210C-BBE9-4C64-8F51-7DC74ACF8F86 at dell dot com> <20150408200315 dot GA6777 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <83egntg37h dot fsf at gnu dot org> <20150409173950 dot GA3400 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <83pp7ddvcq dot fsf at gnu dot org> <20150410080933 dot GA8497 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:09:33 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paul_Koning@dell.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com
>
> I have just added:
> This feature is only relevant for
> platforms where @code{-g} produces DWARF by default, otherwise one may
> try to enforce DWARF by using @code{-gdwarf-4}.
That's good enough, thanks.
> > > +Specifically @code{PATH} is searched for binaries matching regular expression
> > > +@code{@var{ARCH}(-[^-]*)?-@var{OS}-gcc} according to the inferior target being
> > > +debugged. @code{@var{ARCH}} is processor name - multiarch is supported,
> [...]
> > > +for pattern @code{s390x?}. @code{OS} is currently supported only for
> > > ^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > @var{os}.
>
> Not sure if @code{@var{os}} is the same as @var{os}, used only @var{os}.
@var{os} without @code was what I meant, sorry for being unclear.
Thanks, this version is fine with me.