This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] DWARFv5 DW_TAG_aligned_type.


>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com> writes:

Mark> Or we could say that a producer
Mark> is responsible for interpreting the language semantics by making sure
Mark> that the "outer" user alignment overrides any other user alignment tags
Mark> (so in the C case, the producer would NOT add an extra user alignment
Mark> tag, unless it was stricter than any existing ones for the underlying
Mark> type). I think my preference is to do the second, make the producer
Mark> responsible. What do you think?

That certainly seems both simple and clear.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]