This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] Validate symbol file using build-id
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, ARistovski at qnx dot com
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:28:37 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] Validate symbol file using build-id
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140319223004 dot 14668 dot 20989 dot stgit at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <20140319223123 dot 14668 dot 95821 dot stgit at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <83mwgl8r3n dot fsf at gnu dot org> <20140320073350 dot GA22555 at host2 dot jankratochvil dot net>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:33:50 +0100
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ARistovski@qnx.com
>
> Hi Eli,
>
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:51:40 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Thanks. I already approved the docs parts, right?
>
> there remains unapproved the doc/gdb.texinfo part of this patch 7/8.
> In this v5 series the text has been even changed due to the functionality
> change:
> * svr4_validate() considers missing local build-id as not-a-match
> (*)
>
> Unfinished discussion with you about this doc/gdb.texinfo part is:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-03/msg00473.html
> Message-ID: <20140319223258.GA5398@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Yes, but in https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-03/msg00219.html
I suggested an addition, which somehow didn't make it here. The only
change I see is in the wording of the warning message you quote.