This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] GDB process record and reverse debugging improvements for arm*-linux*


Hi Omair,

Can you please quickly point me out to the patches, I will start
reviewing form my end.
I am sorry if I have missed your patches sometime before, and I afraid
I dont have them now.
I have a link to your patches.
I could find only one...
<http://sourceware-org.1504.n7.nabble.com/PATCH-2-2-GDB-process-record-and-reverse-debugging-improvements-for-arm-linux-td248415.html>

if you could send all the patches, I shall be able to give my feedback.

Regards,
Oza.




On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 11/08/2013 11:20 AM, Omair Javaid wrote:
>>
>> 2013-11-08  Omair Javaid<omair.javaid@linaro.org>
>>
>>         * arm-linux-tdep.c (struct arm_linux_record_tdep): Declare.
>>         (arm_canonicalize_syscall): New function.
>>         (arm_all_but_pc_registers_record): New function.
>>         (arm_linux_syscall_record): New function.
>>         (arm_linux_init_abi): Add syscall recording constructs.
>>         * arm-tdep.c (thumb_record_ldm_stm_swi): Update thumb syscall
>> decoding.
>>         (arm_record_coproc_data_proc): Update arm syscall decoding.
>>         * arm-tdep.h (gdbarch_tdep): Update arm_syscall_record
>> declaration.
>>
>
> We can write the last entry like this:
>
>         * arm-tdep.h (struct gdbarch_tdep) <arm_swi_record>: Remove.
>         <arm_syscall_record>: New field.
>
>>
>> +#include "record-full.h"
>> +#include "linux-record.h"
>> +
>
>
> We should mention these two inclusions in ChangeLog too, like
>
>         * arm-linux-tdep.c: Include "record-full.h" and
>         "linux-record.h".
>
>>   #include "cli/cli-utils.h"
>>   #include "stap-probe.h"
>>   #include "parser-defs.h"
>> @@ -1231,6 +1234,98 @@ arm_stap_parse_special_token (struct gdb
>>     return 1;
>>   }
>>
>> +/* ARM process record-replay constructs; syscall, signal etc.  */
>> +
>> +struct linux_record_tdep arm_linux_record_tdep;
>> +
>> +/* arm_canonicalize_syscall maps from the native arm Linux set
>> +   of syscall ids into a canonical set of syscall ids used by
>> +   process record.  */
>> +
>> +static enum gdb_syscall
>> +arm_canonicalize_syscall (int syscall)
>> +{
>> +  enum { sys_process_vm_writev = 377 };
>> +
>> +  if (syscall <=  gdb_sys_sched_getaffinity)
>> +    {
>> +      return syscall;
>> +    }
>
>
> Unnecessary braces.
>
>> +  else if (syscall >= 243 && syscall <= 247 )
>> +    {
>> +      return syscall + 2;
>> +    }
>> +  else if (syscall >= 248 && syscall <= 253 )
>> +    {
>> +      return syscall + 4;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +  return -1;
>> +}
>
>
>> +
>> +/* Handler for arm system call instruction and recording.  */
>> +
>> +static int
>> +arm_linux_syscall_record (struct regcache *regcache, unsigned long
>> svc_number)
>
>
> Your mailer should wrap your patch.  That means other people can't apply
> your patch cleanly.
>
> Patch looks good to me but you still need a maintainer's approval.
>
> --
> Yao (éå)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]