This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v3] Windows x64 SEH unwinder


Hi there,

On 08/23/2013 07:53 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> 
> On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I'm guessing that using SEH if available would
>> be better over dwarf2 (though I don't know for sure).
> 
> Why ?  

No particular reason -- I guess I got confused by earlier
discussions in v1/v2, and I understood it as such.

> I think that both unwinders should be correct. One might
> be faster than the other, but I don't know which.

Okay.

> 
>> And, this version is then a compromise.  Right?
> 
> The only compromise is when there are no unwind infos.  Previously
> a default unwinder based on heuristic was used (doesn't work well,
> particularly for MS dll).  With the patch, they are considered as
> leaf functions by the SEH unwinder.

Okay.

FAOD, the patch is fine with me.

-- 
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]