This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 05/17] ARM support
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:20:45 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] ARM support
- References: <1372664545-3947-1-git-send-email-sergiodj at redhat dot com> <1372664545-3947-6-git-send-email-sergiodj at redhat dot com>
>>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Durigan Junior <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Sergio> Support for the ARM target. Even though ARM shares almost everything
Sergio> with x86 regarding signal numbers, there is SIGSWI which is an ARM-only
Sergio> signal as far as I have verified. However, GDB's internal signal
Sergio> definition does not recognize SIGSWI, so there is nothing we can/must
I think this is a bit peculiar in a couple of ways.
SIGSWI has the same value as SIGRTMIN.
So there is some confusion somewhere.
At the very least, it seems like if this is correct, then we maybe
couldn't sensible translate SIGSWI.
Second, the new enum seems like dead code. It's only a matter of time
until someone notices and removes it. Perhaps a comment somewhere would