This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Move some code into get_register.


Hi,
This is a refactor patch.  This patch moves some common code in
caller of get_register into get_register, and rename it to
output_register.  With this patch, the caller of output_register can
be simplified to some extent.

gdb:

2013-06-07  Pedro Alves  <pedro@codesourcery.com>
	    Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>

	* mi/mi-main.c (get_register): Remove declaration.
	(output_register): Declare.
	(mi_cmd_data_list_register_values): Remove local variable
	'tuple_cleanup'.  Move some code into output_register.
	(get_register): Renamed to ...
	(output_register): ... it.
---
 gdb/mi/mi-main.c |   27 +++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/mi/mi-main.c b/gdb/mi/mi-main.c
index f69cd8d..454198b 100644
--- a/gdb/mi/mi-main.c
+++ b/gdb/mi/mi-main.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void mi_execute_async_cli_command (char *cli_command,
 					  char **argv, int argc);
 static int register_changed_p (int regnum, struct regcache *,
 			       struct regcache *);
-static void get_register (struct frame_info *, int regnum, int format);
+static void output_register (struct frame_info *, int regnum, int format);
 
 /* Command implementations.  FIXME: Is this libgdb?  No.  This is the MI
    layer that calls libgdb.  Any operation used in the below should be
@@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ mi_cmd_data_list_register_values (char *command, char **argv, int argc)
   struct gdbarch *gdbarch;
   int regnum, numregs, format;
   int i;
-  struct cleanup *list_cleanup, *tuple_cleanup;
+  struct cleanup *list_cleanup;
 
   /* Note that the test for a valid register must include checking the
      gdbarch_register_name because gdbarch_num_regs may be allocated
@@ -1103,10 +1103,8 @@ mi_cmd_data_list_register_values (char *command, char **argv, int argc)
 	  if (gdbarch_register_name (gdbarch, regnum) == NULL
 	      || *(gdbarch_register_name (gdbarch, regnum)) == '\0')
 	    continue;
-	  tuple_cleanup = make_cleanup_ui_out_tuple_begin_end (uiout, NULL);
-	  ui_out_field_int (uiout, "number", regnum);
-	  get_register (frame, regnum, format);
-	  do_cleanups (tuple_cleanup);
+
+	  output_register (frame, regnum, format);
 	}
     }
 
@@ -1119,26 +1117,25 @@ mi_cmd_data_list_register_values (char *command, char **argv, int argc)
 	  && regnum < numregs
 	  && gdbarch_register_name (gdbarch, regnum) != NULL
 	  && *gdbarch_register_name (gdbarch, regnum) != '\000')
-	{
-	  tuple_cleanup = make_cleanup_ui_out_tuple_begin_end (uiout, NULL);
-	  ui_out_field_int (uiout, "number", regnum);
-	  get_register (frame, regnum, format);
-	  do_cleanups (tuple_cleanup);
-	}
+	output_register (frame, regnum, format);
       else
 	error (_("bad register number"));
     }
   do_cleanups (list_cleanup);
 }
 
-/* Output one register's contents in the desired format.  */
+/* Output one register REGNUM's contents in the desired FORMAT.  */
 
 static void
-get_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum, int format)
+output_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum, int format)
 {
   struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (frame);
   struct ui_out *uiout = current_uiout;
   struct value *val;
+  struct cleanup *tuple_cleanup;
+
+  tuple_cleanup = make_cleanup_ui_out_tuple_begin_end (uiout, NULL);
+  ui_out_field_int (uiout, "number", regnum);
 
   if (format == 'N')
     format = 0;
@@ -1184,6 +1181,8 @@ get_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum, int format)
       ui_out_field_stream (uiout, "value", stb);
       do_cleanups (old_chain);
     }
+
+  do_cleanups (tuple_cleanup);
 }
 
 /* Write given values into registers. The registers and values are
-- 
1.7.7.6


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]