This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: unnecessary aarch64_write_pc ?


> Thanks for the heads up; yes, aarch64_write_pc doesn't appear
> necessary.  I've prepared the attached patch to remove the function.

Awesome, thanks for confirming. The patch is approved if you throw in
a ChangeLog entry :).

> diff --git a/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c b/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
> index ebc78d6..2b03106 100644
> --- a/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
> @@ -2499,14 +2499,6 @@ aarch64_pseudo_write (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct regcache *regcache,
>    gdb_assert_not_reached ("regnum out of bound");
>  }
>  
> -/* Implement the "write_pc" gdbarch method.  */
> -
> -static void
> -aarch64_write_pc (struct regcache *regcache, CORE_ADDR pc)
> -{
> -  regcache_cooked_write_unsigned (regcache, AARCH64_PC_REGNUM, pc);
> -}
> -
>  /* Callback function for user_reg_add.  */
>  
>  static struct value *
> @@ -2618,8 +2610,6 @@ aarch64_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
>    set_gdbarch_push_dummy_call (gdbarch, aarch64_push_dummy_call);
>    set_gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, aarch64_frame_align);
>  
> -  set_gdbarch_write_pc (gdbarch, aarch64_write_pc);
> -
>    /* Frame handling.  */
>    set_gdbarch_dummy_id (gdbarch, aarch64_dummy_id);
>    set_gdbarch_unwind_pc (gdbarch, aarch64_unwind_pc);


-- 
Joel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]