This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: zinteger setshow commands broken

From: "Abid, Hafiz" <hafiz_abid at mentor dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
Cc: <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, <stan at codesourcery dot com>, <yao at codesourcery dot com>, <eliz at gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:10:24 +0000
Subject: Re: zinteger setshow commands broken

On 01/03/13 18:13:21, Pedro Alves wrote:


BTW, I think the new var_zuinteger_unlimited would be more
suitable.  The difference is that "show" really shows "unlimited"
instead of -1.  BTW2, IMO, "set" should accept literal "unlimited"
string as well too.

To make sure that I understand it right, you are suggesting that commands which accepts -1 as special value should be implemented using var_zuinteger_unlimited? One is the new command that I am working on to change the trace buffer size. Other is "remote hardware-watchpoint-limit".

Regards,
Abid

Follow-Ups:
- Re: zinteger setshow commands broken
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: zinteger setshow commands broken
  - From: Pedro Alves

References:
- zinteger setshow commands broken
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]