Re: [patch] cleanup: Wunused corefile.c

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Aleksandar" == Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com> writes:

Aleksandar> This is why I put a FIXME - intending to revisit and properly fix.

FIXME comments are just ignored in practice.  IME, nobody ever fixes
them except as a side effect of what they were intending to do.

Aleksandar> But there are other cases where it is not about missing code, but
Aleksandar> e.g. conditional compilation. For example:

Yeah, in that case I am less sure.
Making the definition conditional might be ok.
Or it might be uglier than the occasional ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED.
I guess it depends on the case.

Aleksandar> However, I do not intend to push this very hard due to lack
Aleksandar> of time. I simply did a swipe over the code and made it
Aleksandar> compile with Wunused (without regressions) on
Aleksandar> x86_64-linux-gnu and wanted to contribute as much as I can
Aleksandar> without spending too much time on it.

I understand, but I think the hard part of this work is also the most
useful part.  What I mean is that it is certainly valuable to get all
the simple cases fixed; but going through the trickier cases and writing
proper fixes is the real benefit of enabling this warning -- finding and
fixing real bugs.  Making these warnings disappear is contrary to that.

Tom