This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> I do not understand "Do.". Either "Likewise." or also "New file.". Fixed. > For GDB repository it is only 2012. Fixed. > It executes: > run {set debug jit 1} > Use: > gdb_test_no_output "set debug jit 1" Fixed. > It executes: (gdb) run run > > Besides that it does not wait on the SIGTRAP output it produces, so it is > racy. use: > gdb_run_cmd > gdb_test "" "Program received signal SIGTRAP, .*" "expect SIGTRAP" Fixed. > I do not understand why you do not use gdb/jit.h here? This file is > a duplicate. Sorry if it was already discussed during initial JIT review. I don't think this has been discussed, but my justification is that we'd want the JIT tests to break if we make ABI incompatible changes to the structures in jit.h (which, loosely speaking, are part of GDB's "interface"). As an aside, something seems to have gone wrong with my SSH keys and I was wondering if someone could commit my work (patches attached) for me, if that is permissible. -- Sanjoy Das http://playingwithpointers.com
Attachment:
0001-Fix-segfault-when-unwinding-JIT-frames-using-a-custo.patch
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
0002-Make-jit-reader-load-accept-absolute-paths-to-reader.patch
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
0003-Add-a-test-case-for-the-jit-reader-interface.patch
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |