This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patchv2] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename)
- From: iam ahal <hal9000ed2k at gmail dot com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 20:38:59 +0400
- Subject: Re: [patchv2] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename)
- References: <20121130185653.GA15394@host2.jankratochvil.net> <CAA18ubKwa7dn8LAtRJ9i_5zf7XXNu5NikE1uCM_c7nrANTzt=A@mail.gmail.com> <20121201171439.GA20612@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Hi Jan,
At first glance, it looks that the new patch has all the options like
my original patch.
As I understand the default "as-recorded" was replaced by "relative",
so it looks good for me. Thank you.
With best regards,
~Eldar
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Eldar,
>
> On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:09:28 +0100, iam ahal wrote:
>> Is this new patch (with your and my code) already committed to repository?
>
> no. (It would be marked as [commit] and some such wording would be there.)
> It is sent for a possible new review/comments although I do not expect any
> real changes in this part as it has been already thoroughly discussed before.
>
> But I would like your opinion whether this patch provides all the options like
> your original patch. One cannot directly compared it as the
> directories/filenames situation is now changed after you apply beforehand the
> patch:
> [patch] Limit DW_AT_comp_dir workaround only for gcc<=4.2
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-11/msg00948.html
> Message-ID: <20121130173946.GA12865@host2.jankratochvil.net>
>
> Thanks,
> Jan