This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] Fix .text section offset for windows DLL (was Calling __stdcall functions in the inferior)
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Pierre Muller <pierre dot muller at ics-cnrs dot unistra dot fr>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:45:17 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix .text section offset for windows DLL (was Calling __stdcall functions in the inferior)
- References: <83a9vs89r9.fsf@gnu.org> <201210120953.q9C9rqfu020865@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <834nm07z0s.fsf@gnu.org> <5077FEB9.4030304@redhat.com> <83y5jb7rfe.fsf@gnu.org> <006001cdaada$00c81f00$02585d00$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
Hi Pierre,
I don't know COFF/PE all that well, so I'll just trust you on
the extraction of the information itself. Thanks for taking this on,
by the way.
Oh dear - I just realized midway through the review that the patch
appears to be checked in already. I must have missed the associated
emails.... I've continued the review anyways - it's nothing major,
but there are a few nits I noticed. If you don't have time to look
at them, no problem; I'll try to get to them. But do let me know.
> 2012-10-15 Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
>
> * coff-pe-read.h (pe_text_section_offset): Declare new function.
> * coff-pe-read.c (pe_as16): New function.
> (read_pe_exported_syms): Use ordinal of function to
> retrieve correct RVA address of function.
> (pe_text_section_offset): New function.
>
> * windows-tdep.c (windows_xfer_shared_library): Use
> pe_text_section_offset function instead of possibly wrong
> 0x1000 constant for .text sextion offset.
> @@ -336,26 +344,119 @@ read_pe_exported_syms (struct objfile *o
> {
> /* Pointer to the names vector. */
> unsigned long name_rva = pe_as32 (erva + name_rvas + i * 4);
> + /* Retrieve ordinal value */
> +
> + unsigned long ordinal = pe_as16 (erva + ordinals + i * 2);
Just a nit: Can we keep the formatting consistent between the two
local variables? In other words, no empty line between the comment
and the variable?
> + if (!section_found)
> + {
> + char * forward_name = (char *) (erva + func_rva);
> + char * funcname = (char *) (erva + name_rva);
> + if ((func_rva >= export_rva)
> + && (func_rva < export_rva + export_size))
Can you add an empty line between the variable declarations and
the rest of the code.
Also, the if condition is idented using spaces instead of tabs...
> + printf ("%s is a forward to %s\n", funcname, forward_name);
I don't think a printf is appropriate, here. Is that meant to be
a warning?
> +CORE_ADDR
> +pe_text_section_offset (struct bfd *abfd)
Can you add a description of what the function does?
> + unsigned long pe_header_offset, opthdr_ofs, num_entries, i;
This is a nit as well, but can you rename opthdr_ofs? I'm a little
confused, as the 's' at the end made me think that it was a plural,
and thus that it was a set of offsets. But looking at the type and
at the code, I am thinking now that this is a short for "offset",
except an 'f' would be missing. How about spelling offset entirely?
> + unsigned char *expdata, *erva;
Should we be using gdb_byte *, in this case? I'm wondering if we
should be adjusting the pe_get* & pe_as* routines as well...
> + if (!is_pe32 && !is_pe64)
> + {
> + /* This is not a recognized PE format file. Abort now, because
> + the code is untested on anything else. *FIXME* test on
> + further architectures and loosen or remove this test. */
> + return 0;
> + }
I think a complaint would be appropriate, here. And I'm wondering
if there might be a better way to check which PE format it is other
than looking at a string...
> + if (num_entries < 1) /* No exports. */
> + {
> + return 0;
> + }
Formatting: Can you remove the curly braces? For one statement,
our codig style says that we should not be using them.
> @@ -387,6 +390,9 @@ windows_xfer_shared_library (const char*
> struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct obstack *obstack)
> {
> char *p;
> + struct bfd * dll;
> + CORE_ADDR text_offset;
> + CORE_ADDR default_text_offset = 0x1000;
> obstack_grow_str (obstack, "<library name=\"");
Can you add an empty line after the local variable declarations?
> + if (text_offset != default_text_offset)
> + warning (_("DLL %s has .text section at offset %s\n"),so_name,
Missing space after the coma (just before 'so_name').
--
Joel