This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 10/12/2012 09:57 AM, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
+if {[skip_shlib_tests]} { + untested ctxobj.exp + return -1 +}
See<http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDBTestcaseCookbook>.
"In untested calls, please spell out the reason the test ends up untested, instead of just writing the test name, as with the latter we just end up with the test name duplicated in the gdb.sum output. For example: "
But in these skip_ *cases, I think we can just be silent. The vast majority of the skip_* calls in the testsuite agrees (e.g., seen with 'grep -rn "skip_" -A 3 | grep untested').
IOW, this is OK with the untested calls removed.
I've removed the untested calls; the updated patch has been committed http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-10/msg00077.html.
Thanks, Yufeng
Attachment:
skip-shared-lib-tests.patch.v2
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |