Re: [PATCH 2/2] new tracepoint downloaded MI notification.

[Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>]

On 09/29/2012 10:13 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> Nowadays, location number is generated by incrementing a counter during
> iterating a list of bp_location of breakpoint (in
> breakpoint.c:print_one_breakpoint), so I am wondering that the
> bp_location object may have the different number, if the list of
> bp_locations of a breakpoint is removed due to some reasons.  Looks
> bp_location list of breakpoint is *not* removed except in
> breakpoint_program_space_exit, after examine the source code.
>
> For example,
>
> Originally we have a tracepoint of 3 locations,
>
> 4       tracepoint     keep y   <MULTIPLE>
>          collect $eip^M
> 4.1                         y     0x0804859c in func4 inf 1
> 4.2                         y     0xb7ffc480 in func4 inf 2
> 4.3                         y     0xb7ffc488 in func4 inf 1
>
> due to some reason, bp_location on address 0xb7ffc480 is removed (for
> example, inferior 2 is removed), and original bp_location 4.3 becomes 4.2.
>
> In short, if we can make location number persistent (unchanged for a
> given bp_location object), then {number, location number} is fine,
> otherwise, I'd prefer {number, address}.

On the other hand, if 'adding bp_location number of a breakpoint' can be 
justified, I'd like to do that, and use bp_location number instead of 
address here.  However, I am not sure whether we need add bp_location 
number.  It is slightly overkill to do so.  Any thoughts?

--
Yao